|
Post by TK3. on Mar 29, 2009 7:40:55 GMT -5
----------------------------- Proposal - On Season 30, we try and do a non-cap league. However, Camino will assemble randomly all thirty teams. This leaves the choice of GMs just keeping their rosters at $50 like a usual season or go for it all. I think it could possibly have the same effect as it did when Camino assembled teams with 5 $10+ guys. Unreal teams could come out of this if the GM is a solid one.
Rules: - You still follow the trading salary rules - ( NO MORE CAP )
|
|
|
Post by CommandnConquer on Mar 29, 2009 7:54:47 GMT -5
well i think this cud be a good time 2 test it in dleague
|
|
|
Post by TFL on Mar 29, 2009 9:01:19 GMT -5
No incentive in trading expensive players if no cap would limit the trading activity.
|
|
|
Post by wallyworld on Mar 29, 2009 10:10:26 GMT -5
No incentive in trading expensive players if no cap would limit the trading activity. thats what i feel too... there will be less activity... but if its only for 1 season, why not give it a go? im neutral anyways...
|
|
|
Post by jodiejojo on Mar 29, 2009 11:50:05 GMT -5
maybe a $60 cap would be better
|
|
|
Post by Catz on Mar 29, 2009 12:18:31 GMT -5
Not a fan.
It would equal the worst season ever, and we could lose activity.
The cap is the beauty to the game.
|
|
|
Post by gabe1313 on Mar 29, 2009 12:24:23 GMT -5
Not a fan. It would equal the worst season ever, and we could lose activity. The cap is the beauty to the game. I agree.
|
|
|
Post by wizzla11 on Mar 29, 2009 13:38:22 GMT -5
Not a fan. It would equal the worst season ever, and we could lose activity. The cap is the beauty to the game. I thonk it would be a real slow trading season. Little trading and teams will be just based on who can get the best players no matter the chemistry. If anything just chamge the cap but don't eliminate it. you could try it in the D league but I vote against it but majority rules right if more GMs want to do it then I guess we'll do it.
|
|